Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
5.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 36(4): 263-8, 2011 Feb 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20622748

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: A cohort study analyzing the cervical range of motion of subjects with anterior cervical decompression and fusion operation (ACDF). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the cervical range of motion of subjects who underwent an ACDF operation to age-matched healthy nonoperative subjects. Subjects were divided according to the number of operated levels, postoperative time point, and level of disability. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ACDF is an operative treatment aimed at expansion of the spinal canal and relief of cord compression. In addition to alleviating pain, 2 common tools are used to measure postoperative success; cervical range of motion kinematic analysis and subjective evaluation questionnaires (Neck Disability Index [NDI]). METHODS: This study involved 25 preoperative and 110 postoperative ACDF subjects as well as 18 control volunteers with no prior history of neck complaints. ACDF subjects were divided according to the number of operated levels; 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-levels as well as time of their clinical visit; preoperative, early, and late postoperative. Before kinematic testing, the subjects were asked to complete the NDI survey. A virtual reality assisted electromagnetic tracking was used to measure an active voluntary motion of the head relative to the torso. The subjects' maximum range of motion was calculated and compared as they executed 3 to 5 consecutive cycles of the primary motions, flexion/extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending. An analysis of variance statistical test (P < 0.01) was used to determine significant differences between study groups. RESULTS.: Subject's range of motion decreased relative to control as the number of operated levels increased. Moreover, 1- and 2-level subjects increased their range motion relative to preoperative. Finally, there was a decrease in range of motion as the subject's level of disability increased as measured by an NDI score but all subjects reported a lower score relative to preoperative time point. CONCLUSION: The active range of motion of subjects who underwent an ACDF surgery increased postoperative and was dependent on the number of operated levels. In addition, there was an improvement in the disability level after the surgery as measured by the NDI score.


Assuntos
Vértebras Cervicais/fisiopatologia , Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Descompressão Cirúrgica/métodos , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Pós-Operatório , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
10.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 45(2): 316-23, 2005 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15685510

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: No published study has reported the combined effect of diabetes and hypertension on heart disease in patients with renal failure. We determined this effect by using data for all US adults who started renal replacement therapy from 1995 to 1999. METHODS: Data for patient characteristics, diabetes, hypertension, and heart disease were collected from the Medical Evidence Report, on which 6 cardiac conditions were recorded: congestive heart failure, ischemic heart disease, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, cardiac arrhythmia, and pericarditis. On the basis of diabetic-hypertensive status, we categorized patients into 4 groups: diabetes only, hypertension only, both diabetes and hypertension, and neither diabetes nor hypertension. Adjusting for age, sex, race-ethnicity, and incidence year with logistic regression, we estimated the likelihood of heart disease according to diabetic-hypertensive status. RESULTS: Of 373,539 patients, 49.8% had diabetes and 75.8% had hypertension; 11.4% had diabetes only, 37.4% had hypertension only, 38.4% had both diabetes and hypertension, and 12.8% had neither diabetes nor hypertension. Approximately 44% of patients (n = 163,570) had at least 1 condition, 19.4% had at least 2 conditions, and 6.5% had at least 3 of the 6 cardiac conditions. Logistic regression indicated that patients with diabetes only and hypertension only were 3.1 and 2.8 times more likely ( P < 0.0001) to have heart disease than those without diabetes and hypertension, respectively. Patients with both diabetes and hypertension were 5.9, 5.0, and 4.8 times more likely (P < 0.0001) to have at least 1, at least 2, and at least 3 cardiac conditions than those with neither diabetes nor hypertension, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients with renal failure with both diabetes and hypertension are more likely to have heart disease than those with diabetes only and hypertension only.


Assuntos
Complicações do Diabetes/epidemiologia , Cardiopatias/epidemiologia , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Falência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Complicações do Diabetes/etnologia , Feminino , Cardiopatias/etnologia , Humanos , Hipertensão/etnologia , Falência Renal Crônica/etnologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia de Substituição Renal/métodos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
11.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 45(1 Suppl 1): A5-7, S1-280, 2005 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15640975
13.
Kidney Int ; 61(2): 734-40, 2002 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11849417

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Comparisons of mortality outcomes between peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients have shown varying results, which may be caused by the unequally distributed clinical conditions of patients at initiation. To address this issue, we evaluated the clinical characteristics of 105,954 patients at the initiation of PD and HD, using the U.S. national incidence data on treated end-stage renal disease from the Medical Evidence Form, 1995 to 1997. METHODS: A general linear model was used to analyze differences of age, albumin, creatinine, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and hematocrit; categorical data analysis to evaluate body mass index (BMI), grouped into four categories: < 19, 19-25 (< 25), 25-30 (< 30), and 30+; and logistic regression to assess the likelihood of initiating PD versus HD. Diabetics (DM) were analyzed separately from non-diabetics (NDM). Explanatory variables in the logistic regression included incidence year, race, gender, age, BMI, albumin, creatinine, BUN, and hematocrit. Race included white and black. Age was categorized into four groups: 20-44, 45-64, 65-74, and 75+. RESULTS: At the initiation of dialysis PD patients were approximately 6 years younger (P < 0.0001) than HD patients. PD patients also had higher (P < 0.0001) albumin (+0.35 g/dL for DM and +0.23 g/dL for NDM) and hematocrit (+1.64% for DM and +1.71% for NDM) levels, and lower (P < 0.04) BUN (-8.75 mg/dL for DM and -5.24 mg/dL for NDM) and creatinine (-0.51 mg/dL for DM and -0.23 mg/dL for NDM) levels than HD patients. Whites had a higher (P < 0.0001) likelihood of starting PD than blacks, and patients with BMI <19 had a lower (P < 0.0001) chance of beginning on PD. CONCLUSION: PD patients had favorable clinical conditions at the initiation of dialysis, which should be taken into consideration when comparing dialysis outcomes between the two modalities.


Assuntos
Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Diálise Peritoneal/mortalidade , Diálise Renal/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , População Negra , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes , Distribuição por Sexo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Branca
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...